No no no no no. I do NOT think hes the antichrist. I think hes satanic. Where did I say hes THE antichrist.
those images where from bushantichrist.com Def. of antichrist- "A reality that stands opposed to Jesus, but also that claims to be the Christ, the anointed of God, must be a man as Christ was a man, a man in whom they put their trust, a man to whom the people can look for deliverance from their miseries."
Yes I know they were I got them off google images real fast but why does that matter that site did not take those pictures. Ever heard of skull and bones? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones
you're too much man, you're leading a crusade against nothing blah, blah, blah Bush is evil, yeah we all know it, but I didn't vote so don't blame me... what if there wasn't a war? would this have been such a big fucking deal or would people have treated him as another nixon?
I'm not forcing you to come back here and continue posting. I'm here to debate with people on what I believe and what they believe. Plain and simple. If there were no war then there would be no point of 9/11. 9/11 happened to have a reason for war. No matter what this is still a big deal its not something you can just say " FUCK IT " about and just move on thats what they want.
Not possible. As far as I know, neither of the countries that we are currently fighting in have or had the capability of sending a missile the entire distance to the U.S. undetected. In addition, a missile from overseas would most likely come in from above, rather than mere inches above the ground. A plane, obviously, would also have to come from higher up than the inches to a couple feet that it would take to create the impact that it did, especially as it was being flown by an amateur pilot.
Wow. Somebody seriously needs to grow up. For you to even consider for one second that our own country would carry out attacks on it's own people is ridiculous and pathetic. This isn't a debate, this is you trying to throw out a bunch of nonfactual, unsupported conspiracies claiming they are the truth or that our government would lie to us about the Pentagon being hit by a 747 or missile. Don't you think a war would be more supported if we had actually been hit by a missile? Think about it. And don't blame the war on Bush alone. Everybody seems to forget that the democrats also voted for the United States to go to war but then when things started to turn sour they all got down on their knees claiming it was never their idea and they didn't vote for the war. I'm glad we are in Iraq; let alone Afghanistan. We've removed a man from power that did actually kill and attack his own people. How the hell can that be a bad thing? When you have an informative and factual post to make, then come back. But please, enough with the conspiracy bullshit.
As far as you know.. and wtf are you talking about? An amateur pilot wouldn't be able to fly that close to the ground w/o crashing
Im done in this topic....Yeah you have freedom of speech. Along with freedom to say things that are stupid, ignorant, and baseless.
fuck bush, and yes it was an inside job. i have written a rhyme for bush, but i dont really want to post it anywhere cos someone might steal it. but here is a preview: sending your soldiers to their graves like slaves all for the bank accounts to get raised. seem to think life is a game suplying the guns so everyone can play wasting millions on weapons instead curing aids but keep an eye out, when i record it onto a beat ill put it up on myspace music.
They weren't amateur pilots. They received a lot of training and had actually received, if I remember correctly, a pilots license; and it's not like they were flying 50' about the ground for a few miles until they hit the Pentagon, they had come in at a sharp angle and leveled out to hit the building -- which would be a lot like landing a plane, which wouldn't be difficult for anybody that has the training to do so.
and who where they trained by? AMERICA!! that just shows it was self inflicted. they just didnt think that info would leak
I agree with most of BobaFett's arguements though I disagree with the fact we are still in IRAQ. Whenever things like this happen... there's always the "conspiracy theorist's" cropping up from everywhere. Examples: The Kennedy Conspiracy The govenrment covering up that UFO's landing in the desert The reason for this is they hear something, pass it on to someone, that someone passes it on to another person. In the end "all the facts" are completely distorted" Take for example how everyone is saying "a 747 hit the pentagon" or it was a missle. Totally wrong. First, it's well known it was a "Boeing 757" and if you'd take the time to view photos of the crash scene, you'll see the plane crashed into the ground a couple hundred feet before hitting the pentagon, and the burn pattern on the ground could not be from a missle. Nor could the wreckage be identified as anything other than the wreckage of Flight 77. Before (edit: anyone) posts rumours or non-facts, I suggest you read the actual 911 Commission Report. Here's the link. http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf or go to the website at: http://www.9-11commission.gov/ -just my humble opinion-
That's like asking who educated people that commit crimes. Of course private companies trained those men to become pilots; they were paying customers that wanted to learn to fly. The attacks were not self inflicted, people took advantage of the free market here in America to carry out their terrible deeds on America.
It's really not even that eybrow raising that theese people wanted to learn to fly. Tons of people from thousands of nationalitys have interests in flying. Like the pilots would of known they were going to kamikaze the towers.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I def. know not to believe everything the gov't tells me.... the 9/11 commission report is from the gov't, and secondly how could you really ever know, unless you were there and Boba is right about Iraq
While bush did not organise the attacks against his own country, history has prooven over and over that wars are easy to get into but hard to get out of.
i would think yes since saddam tried it before but failed and they should have had higher security...
I don't believe everything I read. Only the topics I research, and then I form my own opinion. As for my not being there. To use your own words... You weren't there when they were writing the report so you don't know if it's true or not either! You're just speculating. Just saying you don't believe the 911 Commission does not prove your point by skirting the issue and injecting a negative about everything in government. If you've got proof that the 911 commission is a complete hoax, I'm sure you'd be on CNN or FOX instead of debating it here. I'd be curious to see if you've even read the report. -just my humble opinion-