Oh man this sequel kicks its predecessor ass. This movie was so well done, the story the action sequence and the villian. I enjoyed this movie better than the lame release by ang lee. have you watched it yet? In my opinion it is just as good as ironman if not better.
i saw it. i thought it was great. usually movies based off of comics are horrible so i was kind of wary of seeing it but i'm glad i did.
better then ironman? no but close. This isnt a sequel to the 2003's HULK its more of a reboot. My only complaint is that the hulk didnt look like ed norton at all =\
I think it was Ok fir me, but thats just because I'm not really interested in Marvel. If I go and see a movie like that, my brothers will be goin around for 2 Days sayin: HULK SMASH!! or something, it gets annoying.
I really liked this one a lot better than the first, I walked out feeling good about spending my $10 on a movie ticket.
Why a remake just after 5 years? Anyway I didn't see the 2003 version with Eric Bana... but I really have to see this with Edward Norton!!! <3 He's one of my favourite actors, even if I don't imagine him as Hulk xD The only thing is that none come with me to the cinema to see Hulk .__. and I'm embarassed too to see it xD
I didn't want to see the new one, just because the last one was such a classic. I had a mug that when you put hot liquid in it the hulk appeared on the side. So retro lol. But a lot of people have been raving about the new one. I may be swayed.... Do you think it's worth the watch? (Bearing in mind the last thing I saw was 'sex and the city' and loved it lol)
Well its more for the action fan and those who were fans of the old TV series. The 2003 was too slow and took forever to get to the actual "hulk" part.
There were far more flaws with the '03 release than just the time it took to get going. But I agree that the new release is far, far better than the first.
boring, actors were horrible, hulk looked terrible in that movie and the fight scene with the main villian was less than 10 mins left in the movie. it was horrendous. :X:
Eric Bana is not a bad actor >=[ .. He's a good one. Just he wasn't meant to be Bruce Banner. Bruce Banner is a stocky nerdy type character, while Bana is a complete Bad Ass (i.e Hector in Troy, BAD ASS)... But it took too long to get to the main story, the Hulk looked like Shrek and its was pretty bad.
Another problem, at least for me, was the thing with the multiple panels during half the scenes. Sure it gives a more comic-bookey feel to the movie, but come on. It makes the movie just that much more difficult to pay attention to when you've got irrelevant details and little bits and pieces of other scenery flashing in front of your eyes.
oh i know Eric Bana was a good actor but he wasn't right for the hulk. OKay sry lol... but lets stay on topic and talk about how much the new one rocked.!
I just saw this!!! It's sooooo much better than the one before. Although, I think Eric Bana is hotter than Norton LOL ><
I heard this one conforms more to the original comic? Wow, sure alot of great responses. I should check it out.
Edward Norton plays Banner MUCH better than Eric Bana ever did, he seems so suited for the role. And I LOVE liv tyler as betty ross, she played her dead spot on! General Ross was much better, everyone was amazing, the action was great, the hulk looked WAY cooler this time. And the final fight actually made sense! Not to mention none of that annoying 'comic panel' stuff in the movie.....I feel sorry for ang lee though, that movie all but killed his career.