Deadly Artillery attack on South Korea

Discussion in 'General Discussions' started by statter, Nov 23, 2010.

  1. Prodigy

    Prodigy Level II

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yonhap News Agency is the only[1] news agency of South Korea. It is publicly-funded, based in the capital Seoul, South Korea, and supplies domestic and foreign news and information to newspaper and TV broadcast and other media in South Korea.

    Wow. Its the ONLY news outlet and its state-run. This is what many Americans are paranoid of. It must be easy to control the population in South Korea.
     
  2. bill293

    bill293 Newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Doesnt North Korea have soldiers currently training with the South Korean soldiers in South Korea?
     
  3. PrinceErik

    PrinceErik Level IV

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    68
    hahha i really really doubt that, since people arent let of north korea, and because NK is crazy
     
  4. Prodigy

    Prodigy Level II

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    2
    Maybe but that seems unlikely as their relations with each other were never great.
     
  5. PrinceErik

    PrinceErik Level IV

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    68
    yeah, i'd say no0 chance since they are at war haha, just thought about that lol
     
  6. Prodigy

    Prodigy Level II

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well, they're only at war recently. Also, is it even a "war" yet? Isn't it just an exchange of artillery shells? Isn't this regular in the Israeli-Palestinian region?
     
  7. PrinceErik

    PrinceErik Level IV

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    68
    hahah no. The Korean War has been going on since 1950
     
  8. Prodigy

    Prodigy Level II

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    2
    .... The Korean War ended with an armistice in 1953.

    Did you think they were nonstop fighting this whole time?
     
  9. PrinceErik

    PrinceErik Level IV

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    68
    no, an armistice does not stop a war, it stops the fighting, it is saying we won't shoot each other. A treaty ends a war.
     
  10. statter

    statter Level II

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    4
    PrinceErik is right, the Korean War was from 1950 until now. That is why there is conscription in both Koreas, because the war has not ended yet
     
  11. Prodigy

    Prodigy Level II

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    2
    It was a cold war if anything; there was no fighting between the two countries after the ceasefire until now. Just because a country practices conscription doesn't mean its at war. Singapore practices conscription as well and it is not involved with any war.
     
  12. Lully

    Lully Level I

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    4
    This is just another cold war...
    There won't be a real war unless they can neutralize the mass destruction weapons first. Furthermore, no country will risk to even support neither one of the Koreas, with the threat to have an atomic bomb against them.
     
  13. RRRJ

    RRRJ Level I

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    I highly doubt the NK will do anything further, if they dont want to risk the end of their regime
     
  14. statter

    statter Level II

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    4
    Prodigy, I am pretty sure that the Korean War started from 1950 until now. Every country has different reasons for conscription, and Korea's reason is that the war has still been going on.
     
  15. dk8932

    dk8932 Level I

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NJ
    I just hope more people dont get hurt...I'm suppose to visit my step siblings back in Seoul ;/
     
  16. Prodigy

    Prodigy Level II

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    2
    No. There was no fighting at after the ceasefire until now. Going by the logic that a war cannot be ended without a formal resolution declaring it to be so, then the Cold War is still going on, but it isn't. It ended with the fall of the Soviet Union.
     
  17. PrinceErik

    PrinceErik Level IV

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    68
    yes. The war still goes on. It is still a war even though there is no fighting. And you are wrong again. The cold war wasn't actually a war. And the dissolving of a nation would be considered an official end if it were a war
     
  18. Prodigy

    Prodigy Level II

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    2
    The nation didn't "dissolve"; power was just shifted inside of it.

    If a war doesn't require fighting, then explain to me why the Cold War wasn't a war.
     
  19. RRRJ

    RRRJ Level I

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think major cities like Seoul should be fine.. it was just the islands and coasts near the army drills that were being targeted.. but right now, thank god for diplomacy
     
  20. PrinceErik

    PrinceErik Level IV

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    68
    the nation dissolved and a new one was created in it. And because there was no declaration of war, therefore, no war.